 |
Author |
TOPIC: MERGER DECISION |
|
| Chris Severino
March 23, 2011
12:52:04 PM
Entry #: 3683092
| AGAIN I HAVE SPOKEN WITH MANY OF OUR PLAYERS AND CAPTAINS AND FROM A HANDFUL OF HARTFORD PLAYERS AND CAPTAINS AND THE PROPOSAL WE PUT OUT YESTERDAY IS WHAT WE ARE WILLING TO GO WITH. EVEN THE FEW TEAMS THAT WANTED A FULL MERGER WERE COMPLETELY ON BOARD WITH THIS PLAN AS A GREAT FIRST STEP.
WE HAVE LEFT THE WEEK OF MAY 29TH OPEN FOR THE RIVALRY WEEK (CROSS-OVER GAMES). IF THE HARTFOED LEAGUE WISHES TO DO THIS THEN SO BE IT. IF NOT THEN WE WILL MOVE OUR GAMES THAT ARE SCHEDULED FOR MOTHERS DAY(MAY 8TH) INTO THAT SLOT.
THIS IS A VERY FAIR OPTION AND WILL GIVE THE TEAMS A TASTE OF MORE TO COME, HOPEFULLY WE CAN CONTINUE TO WORK ON NEW AND EXCITING IDEAS FOR THE FALL AS I AM GLAD WE HAVE OPENED UP THE LINES OF COMMUNICATION.
I COPIED THE PROPOSAL FROM MONDAY BELOW.........
After talking to all the team captains in our league either through text, in person or phone calls, and talking to a few teams from the Hartford league, the feedback I got was this...... There were 3 teams that were willing to do a full merger of leagues and schedules but all 3 of those perferred just merging the playoffs. The remaining teams wanted to play within their own league, have their own playoffs, crown a champion and then have a winner take all super bowl between the leagues.
There were a handful of captains who had some very good points on the different scenarios and I hope they will post them as I dont want to misrepresent what their concerns were.
What I feel the teams were most willing and looking forward to doing is outlined below. I feel that Antwon and I have broken down some of the barriers between us and hope we can continue to move forward in the future. The fact is there are differences in philosiphies between many of the players, captains and even Antwon and I and we are still trying to figure out the best way to compromise and give the best product to the players and still be cognizant of the big picture.
Each league mantains their own schedule and status.
One week in the season (May 29th), would be designated as a cross-over or rivalry week. The current standings at that time will dictate the match-ups. For example, we take the standings at the end of week 7 and create the week 8 schedule with Waterbury #1 vs Hartford #1, Waterbury #2 vs Hartford #2 and so on down the line.
The playoffs are held independently.........
PLAYOFF SCENARIO
Complete each playoff, crowning seperate league champions in both the Pro and Open divisions, then have each leagues Champions meet in the first ever CT League Superbowl.
It was also suggested that we hold a Pro-Bowl the same day as the Pro and Open Superbowls, with players selected from the teams that were not in the championships.
TOURNAMENTS:
KING of CONNECTICUT.......
I would like to offer the King of Connecticut tournament to every team in CT and to do that will make it a full merger with Antwon (50/50). Lower the entry fees as much as possible to ensure every team is able to participate.
The ROSTERS for the King of Connecticut event would have to be the same final rosters teams used in their spring league. No add-ons or team stacking.
32 teams after 12 spots...is much harder than 12 teams after 12 spots
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
12:52:33 PM
Entry #: 3683093
| We need every teams vote for this Merger Proposal please Comment on this post with your Team Name as the author and a simple - For It or Against It.....Thank you
|
|
| Knights
March 23, 2011
12:53:24 PM
Entry #: 3683094
| For It
|
|
|
March 23, 2011
12:57:04 PM
Entry #: 3683099
| Hartford teams scared!
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
1:00:24 PM
Entry #: 3683102
| ^^^^^^^^^^Cash please erase that post we only need teams to vote nothing else
|
|
| Shank Chargers
March 23, 2011
1:06:09 PM
Entry #: 3683116
| For it
|
|
| Warriors
March 23, 2011
1:14:44 PM
Entry #: 3683133
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
1:23:25 PM
Entry #: 3683144
| We have 30 teams total between the two leagues we are going to need more teams to speak up and vote if we are going to get anything done here.
|
|
| Antwon Blunt- CFFL
March 23, 2011
1:30:15 PM
Entry #: 3683157
| Again all that has already been confirmed that it can be done... thatsa not the debate here...
The debate here is i want the best 2 teams to play each other... not the best from waterbury v.s. the best from hartford....THATS A HUGE DIFFERENCE...
NO AREA SHOULD BE GURANTEED A SPOT IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP OR PLAYOFFS
AGAIN WE SELL TO TO DIFFERENT CUSTOMERS ... MINE WHAT ANY AND ALL COMPETITION... GOOD , BAD UGLY... AND WANT ALL THE TEAMS IN ONE UMBRELLA TO CROWN A REAL CHAMP.
THIS MERGER IS NO LONGER A NECESSITY AND DOESNT NEED TO BE DONE... THE TWO AREAS HAVE TWO DIFFERENT STYLES. ILL TRY TO MAKE A COMPROMISE WITH CHRIS TO ALLOW ONLY THE TEAMS WHO WANT TO JOIN OUR TOURNAMENT TO GET A BYE OR SOMETHING..
AGAIN ALL THINGS STATED CAN BE DONBE... BUT TO GUARNTEE THAT BOTH AREAS MAKE THE CHAMPIUONSHIP IS UGLY
EXAMPLE THE GORS HARTFORD COWBOYS PLAYED THE CHARGERS FOR A CHIP ONE YEAR...CLEARLY THE CHARGERS AND THEIR LEAGUE WAS BY FAR SUPERIOR AND THE COWBOYS DID NOT DESERVE TO BE IN THE CHIP.....
THEY GOT THEIR BECAUSE THE HARTFORD LEAGUE WAS THAT TERRIBLE AND ONLY HAD FOUR TEAMS.
WE NEED TO AVOID THIS FROM HAPPENING AT ALL COST PERIOD! BEST 2 TEAMS FOR THE CHIP END OF STORY!
|
|
| 12 Bulldogs
March 23, 2011
1:36:34 PM
Entry #: 3683175
| For it
|
|
| CASH STOP!!!!!
March 23, 2011
1:41:08 PM
Entry #: 3683182
| This is what everyone wants!!!! why is this wrong? and the best 2 teams will face each other! Your last 2 ships had who in them? GUNZ vs. Bulldogs both in different leagues. both teams only lost to each other. POINT proven. im not sure who you think is going to JUMP in this playoff and change things? GUNZ, BULLDOGS, KNIGHTS, STEELERS, CHARGERS, TROJANS ARE THE BEST TEAMS IN THE STATE. DONE no questions asked. and please stop with the ridiculous nonsense of the best teams. Every one in the state knows who they are and who will end up in the finals. to me it sounds like you dont think anyone is going to come out of Hartford besides the GUNZ so your trying to get a different playoff system. when this one is tthe one the players have been asking for.
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
1:42:00 PM
Entry #: 3683184
| Antwon, we see what you are saying but as a general consensus we all seem to agree that the teams are pretty evenly match through out the two leagues....We believe each league has worthy enough teams to be in a state chamopionship game... if you want to play for the states plan and simply just win your league.
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
1:45:57 PM
Entry #: 3683191
| Ok so far we have
4 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Please we need more votes. We want every teams voice heard.
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
1:47:35 PM
Entry #: 3683193
| Cash it sounds like the CT Gamblers may be against it seeing you want a full merger or nothing at all. Can you please submit your vote if this is the case.
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
1:50:28 PM
Entry #: 3683199
| THERE IS NO WRONG ANSWER... IF YOU DONT THINK THE 2 BEST TEAMS SHOULD PLAY FOR THE CHIP... THEN WELL NEVER AGREE... YOU STILL GET EVERYTHING YOU ASK FOR..PLUS YOU WEED OUT ALL THE BOTTOM TEAMS IN THE PROCESS...
AGHAIN IF TEAMS DONT WANT TO WEED OUT THE BOTTOM TEAMS FOR THE PLAYOFFS...THATS SOMETHING IM NOT TRYING TO SELL..
IM NOT GOING TO MAKE TEAMS "WANT" TOP COMPETTIION EVERY WEEK IN THE PLAYOFFS... SOME TEAMS ARENT BUILT FOR THAT
NOT SURE WHY YOU ARENT GETTING WHAT YOU WANT.. YOU ARE IM JUST ADDING MORE TO THAT PROPSAL
|
|
| Antwon Blunt- CFFL
March 23, 2011
1:52:02 PM
Entry #: 3683200
| IM FOR EVERYTHING LISTED... JUST NOT GURANTEEING ANY OF MY TERRIBLE TEAMS GET A SHOT AT THE CHAMPIONSHIP... IF THE TEAMS IN MY LEAGUE SUCK... WHY SHOULD THEY GET TO BE IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP. MY TEAMS SHOULD ONLY GET A SHOT AT THE CHIP IF THEY DESERVE IT NOT BECASUE OF THEIR LOCATION
|
|
|
March 23, 2011
2:01:01 PM
Entry #: 3683215
| trojans have not beat vikings or franchise FACT
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:03:45 PM
Entry #: 3683219
| ^^^^^^ this has nothing to do with voting (please remove).... If you are Vikings or Franchise Please vote - For it or - Against it....Thank you
|
|
| that makes no sense
March 23, 2011
2:04:25 PM
Entry #: 3683220
| ^^^^^^^^ how does this make any sense? Im pretty sure that its a consensus that the GUNZ and Steelers are TOP of CT teams? what do you think the bottom teams in waterbury feel like? the knights and gators have been winning there alot also. you think there chances improve in this system? Im sorry but i agree with the above statements i think this is really only benefiting your team. just win your leagues playoffs and then you play in the superbowl? How is what you offering any better?
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
2:08:13 PM
Entry #: 3683224
| how does lowering the possibilty of making the playoffs and/or making the championship help my team? or any team for that matter?... im honestly asking....with the playoffs combined its gets much tougher to make the playoffs let alone a championship...
but im really asking if you dont mind explaining how does it benefit any team including mine?
|
|
| Explain
March 23, 2011
2:13:52 PM
Entry #: 3683234
| How many teams in your playoffs? 12?
Lets say there is 12 and you take best records of both leagues? what are the tie breakers? can you really take pts for or against when some teams might have been weaker in one league or the other?
what happens if one league has 8 teams that get in? is that fair to the other? thats why two conferences and 1 super bowl works
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:14:12 PM
Entry #: 3683235
| I'm not trying to be rude but This post was created for teams to vote...Cash can you and whoever else is in this discussion with you please start a new thread...Thank you
|
|
| J. Spence
March 23, 2011
2:16:06 PM
Entry #: 3683239
| Cash you are right that it does make it alot harder to win a championship and I have no clue how it helps your team either because your right it doesnt help you, are any team it just makes it harder.
But I think its still backwards whatever way you look at it, why would a league be setup basically like AFC/NFC is in the NFL, with 1 interleague game. Yet the playoffs be mixed. Its a cool and innovative idea, but one that I have never seen or heard of and think is kind of silly personally. Not saying I wouldnt do it, but I dont see it happening.
I dont get the holding point on all of it, if your not going to budge, and Chris isnt going to budge, its simple. Play your league, and he does his. Its a pretty easy solution. Bearcats are voting for Chris' merge because we feel his suggestion is better than no merge at all, but it seems like both sides wont agree, so its time to forget it and play the CFFL with the divisions you setup and worry about football.
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
2:18:04 PM
Entry #: 3683241
| again im not sure what you dont get... are you gughting yourself?
I AGREE THERE SHOULD BE TWO COMNFERNCES AND EVRYTHING ELSE YOU GUYS WANT... I WAANT THE CROSS OVER ETC ETC..
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE HERE IS WHEN CREATING THE TWO CONFERENCES... THEY MIX BOTH LEAGUES... IS THAT SO HARD?
NO ITS NOT... ITS 2 CONFEREENCES... JUST WITH BOTH AREAS IN THEM INSTEAD OF ONE...
SO YES YOU ARE RIGHT.. AND YOU GET WHAT YOU WANT...
SO NOW YOU EXPLAIN WHY WE CANT PUT BOTH AREAS IN ONE CONFRENCE?
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
2:21:38 PM
Entry #: 3683249
| NO OFFENSE JOSH BUT MY PROPOSAL IS THE EXACTLY THE NFLS FORMAT... IM NOT SURE WHY YOUVE NEVER HEARD OF IT IN ANY LEAGUE
|
|
| Player
March 23, 2011
2:21:50 PM
Entry #: 3683252
| I get what your saying but teams that dont travel wont so it will be to hard to figure out what teams will and wont.
|
|
| Bearcats
March 23, 2011
2:21:52 PM
Entry #: 3683253
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:24:32 PM
Entry #: 3683257
| 5 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
****I know hartford team are reading this please submit your votes. So far 4 waterbury teams to 1 hartford team...please place your votes.
|
|
| Da Bearcats
March 23, 2011
2:32:08 PM
Entry #: 3683267
| In the NFL.....
There are 2 separate leagues, they play a couple times in the regular season interleague, but in the playoffs play only their own league until the Championship (Superbowl)
So although the 2 best teams in the NFL could both be in the AFC, they will meet in the AFC Championship, not the Super bowl, thats just the way it is....
Why can't our playoffs just be the same way??
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:38:59 PM
Entry #: 3683277
| Nicely said Bearcats....Teams please continue to vote....your votes are the only way we can make this happen. Thank you
|
|
| skip
March 23, 2011
2:39:46 PM
Entry #: 3683280
| cash thats not like the nfl if anything chris' idea is more like the nfl. you have waterbury(afc) and hartford (nfc). winner of afc (winner of waterbbury league) would face the winner of the nfc (winner of hartford league) in the ct superbowl. cash ur idea is having playoff as ncaa tourny. you want the patriots to meet the steelers in the superbowl and thats not how the nfl format works.( because steelers and patriots are both in the afc)
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:44:17 PM
Entry #: 3683288
| You are exactly right skip... Teams please keep voting.
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
2:45:55 PM
Entry #: 3683290
| i dont know how many times i have to say that you guys are right... all im saying put some teams from both areas in each conference....
Im not diagreeing with any of you which is funny lmao
how should i put this...
if the AFL is merging with the NFL... they would have to place the teams in a conference correct? all im asking is that we mix up the conferences in each area...
so yes waterbury is the AFC...but the AFC.. also hast the AFC WEST AFC EAST etc etc... along with the NFC....
all im asking is that the locations mix the confrences lol...Im not diagreeing with you... we are all saying the same thing to each other lmao...im just staing where i would like the teams placed to give a better feel of who are the top teams
|
|
| Ang
March 23, 2011
2:47:19 PM
Entry #: 3683293
| yes totally agree with the last few posts. I feel like this whole merger thing is just like the nfl lockout. lol kinda funny
|
|
| Ang
March 23, 2011
2:48:13 PM
Entry #: 3683294
| oh gotchya. better clarification that time cash lol
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:51:46 PM
Entry #: 3683301
| That is fine, I understand what you are saying cash but lets get this merger proposal done first and work on your suggest for the Fall...Lets take things one step at a time.
|
|
| skip
March 23, 2011
2:53:04 PM
Entry #: 3683308
| the whole problem with your idea cash is there would have to be traveling one week to waterbury and one week in hartford. people closer to hartford dont want to make that trip to waterbury every other week and vice versa with the waterbury teams. i feel your idea could only work on a neatrul field every week where it would be an equal distance from both places. i for one would not travel to waterbury every other week.
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
2:55:42 PM
Entry #: 3683314
| Skip ... again another great point.. But I am not sure if you have voted For or Against... can you please place a vote on behalf of your team if you have not already done so. Thank you
|
|
|
March 23, 2011
2:56:07 PM
Entry #: 3683315
| Yes cash i see what you are saying BUT what your not realizing is if you do what your proposing then you have to take into account that those teams HAVE to play each other which means someone has to TRAVEL and that is the biggest problem.
AFC:WEST
knights
trojans
raiders
sharks
gators
AFC:EAST
gunz
vikings
hitsquad
gamblers
rams
in this conference these teams would have to travel to play one another. and most teams dont want to travel. You cant mix leagues and not have the teams in a conference not play each other or at least the majority of the conference. you cant do the conference above and only have the hartford side play one of the waterburys side just once and play all the other games against hartford side of the conference and then other hartford teams
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
2:56:23 PM
Entry #: 3683316
| wow in all scenarios no one leave there area for regular season..so thats not a problem even if conferences are combined... the teams will only play in their respective areas
|
|
| Shank
March 23, 2011
2:58:43 PM
Entry #: 3683322
| Cash the reason is for travel puposes. It's safer to just have the cross-over games once or twice now, then revisit it in the fall. Give teams time to prepare for more travels in the fall. If you look at each division in the NFL most teams are relatively close to each other(with some exceptions) . Thats why they have the names NFC SOUTH, AFC WEST etc.....
|
|
| Ang
March 23, 2011
3:01:37 PM
Entry #: 3683327
| holy shit now I see why cash gets so upset. combining conferences will not mean more traveling shank. he is doing this to balance out everything. you will still have the one crossover game and then play the teams in ur area no matter what the division. Lightbulb?
|
|
| Ace of Fadez
March 23, 2011
3:05:51 PM
Entry #: 3683337
| For it
|
|
| thats worse!!
March 23, 2011
3:06:18 PM
Entry #: 3683340
| In what you just said is that if a you had the conference set up the way the above post did. you wouldnt want the team to leave there area they would play their own league then be ranked come playoffs and have not played the opposite side of the conference? HELL NO!!!
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
3:07:01 PM
Entry #: 3683342
| 6 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Keep the votes coming in... Thank you
|
|
| Ang
March 23, 2011
3:08:59 PM
Entry #: 3683347
| bro in the nfl teams do not play against every conference every yr
|
|
| Shank
March 23, 2011
3:14:50 PM
Entry #: 3683356
| National Football League regular season
Following the preseason, each of the thirty-two
teams embark on a seventeen-week, sixteen-game schedule, with the extra week consisting of a bye to allow teams a rest sometime in the middle of the season (and also to increase television coverage). The regular season currently begins the Thursday evening after Labor Day with a primetime "Kickoff Game" (NBC currently holds broadcast rights for that game). According to the current scheduling structure, the earliest the season could begin is September 4 (as it was in the 2008 season), while the latest would be September 10 (as it was in the 2009 season, due to September 1 falling on a Tuesday).
The league uses a scheduling formula to pre-determine which teams plays whom during a given season. Under the current formula since 2002, each of the thirty-two teams' respective 16-game schedule consists for the following:[9][10]
Each team plays the other three teams in their division twice: once at home, and once on the road (six games).
Each team plays the four teams from another division within its own conference once on a rotating three-year cycle: two at home, and two on the road (four games).
Each team plays the four teams from a division in the other conference once on a rotating four-year cycle: two at home, and two on the road (four games).
Each team plays once against the other teams in its conference that finished in the same place in their own divisions as themselves the previous season, not counting the division they were already scheduled to play: one at home, one on the road (two games).
Although this scheduling formula determines each of the thirty-two teams' respective opponents, the league usually does not release the final regular schedule with specific dates and times until the spring the NFL needs several months to coordinate the entire season schedule so that, among other reasons, games are worked around various scheduling conflicts, and that it helps maximize TV ratings.[11]
|
|
| Shank
March 23, 2011
3:21:14 PM
Entry #: 3683363
| Main article: National Football League playoffs
The season concludes with a twelve-team tournament used to determine the teams to play in the Super Bowl. The tournament brackets are made up of six teams from each of the league's two conferences, the American Football Conference (AFC) and the National Football Conference (NFC), following the end of the 16-game regular season:
The four division champions from each conference (the team in each division with the best regular season won-lost-tied record), which are seeded one through four based on their regular season won-lost-tied record (tie-breaker rules may apply).
Two wild card qualifiers from each conference (those non-division champions with the conference's best record, i.e. the best won-lost-tied percentages, with a series of tie-breaking rules in place in the event that there are teams with the same number of wins and losses[12]), which are seeded five and six.
In each conference, the #3 and #6 seeded teams, and the #4 and #5 seeds, face each other during the first round of the playoffs, dubbed the Wild Card Playoffs (the league in recent years has also used the term Wild Card Weekend). The #1 and #2 seeds from each conference receive a bye in the first round, which entitles these teams to automatically advance to the second round, the Divisional Playoff games, to face the winning teams from the first round. In round two, the #1 seeded team always plays the lowest surviving seed in their conference. And in any given playoff game, whoever has the higher seed gets the home field advantage (i.e. the game is held at the higher seed's home field).
The two surviving teams from the Divisional Playoff games meet in Conference Championship games, with the winners of those contests going on to face one another in the Super Bowl in a game located at a neutral venue that is usually either indoors or in a warm-weather locale. The designated "home team" alternates year to year between the conferences. In odd-numbered Super Bowls, the NFC team is the designated "home team", with the AFC team serving as the home team for even-numbered games.
The NFL is the only one out of the four major professional sports leagues in the United States to use a single-elimination tournament in its playoffs Major League Baseball, the National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League all use a "best-of" format instead
|
|
|
March 23, 2011
3:21:46 PM
Entry #: 3683364
| no they dont but they do play against their OWN CONFERENCE:
lets say
NFC East:
Gunz
vikings
rams
red devils
NFC West:
knights
trojans
chargers
gators
how can someone look at the best seed out of the west and say that the gunz without playing the west teams had the same road to the one seed?
|
|
| Hit Squad
March 23, 2011
3:33:07 PM
Entry #: 3683380
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
3:35:33 PM
Entry #: 3683386
| 7 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Still 23 teams who have not voiced their opinion. Please speak up... Thank you
|
|
| Champ Ct Gators
March 23, 2011
4:05:51 PM
Entry #: 3683425
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
4:06:32 PM
Entry #: 3683426
| 8 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Still 22 teams who have not voiced their opinion. Please speak up... Thank you
|
|
| Moe Canes
March 23, 2011
4:19:34 PM
Entry #: 3683447
| For It
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
4:20:11 PM
Entry #: 3683448
| 9 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Still 21 teams who have not voiced their opinion. Please speak up... Thank you
|
|
| Antwon Blunt- CFFL
March 23, 2011
4:23:57 PM
Entry #: 3683453
| arbritration all the hartford teams are for a merger, cross over games pro bowl etc etc..
Chris informed me that the majority of his teams were not for it....
and the only debacle we are having is mixing the teams up at the end... there is no other issue here lol
|
|
|
March 23, 2011
4:26:30 PM
Entry #: 3683458
| I'm sure all the hartford teams are down for whatever correct me if I'm wrong
|
|
| Antwon Blunt- CFFL
March 23, 2011
4:28:00 PM
Entry #: 3683459
| yeah thats what we discussed last night... ive met no opposition to a merger from my currrent teams
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
4:56:43 PM
Entry #: 3683488
| Well so far 7 of Chris's teams and 2 Cash's teams have officially voted in favor for the Merger ...we'll have to discuss this further at Fridays captains meeting.
|
| Holmes.... Assassins
March 23, 2011
7:31:28 PM
Entry #: 3683643
| If we do the cross over week, how will that impact the season records? Also, cash...remember sometimes you have to crawl before you can walk..I totally agree and get what you are trying to do,however,when trying to satisfy both customers in both leagues..sometimes it calls for slow moving progress..but a lil progression will still eventually make it easier to get to the big picture. Hopefully all teams involved can come to some type of agreement that can help feed the competitive hunger that fuels most athletes. I know personally I want to play against any and all competition. good luck to all and let get ready for some football...
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
7:40:18 PM
Entry #: 3683654
| So, Holmes can we count that as a vote "For It" by the Assassin's?
|
|
| famous amos 14 assassins
March 23, 2011
7:58:51 PM
Entry #: 3683675
| I doubt there's anyone on our team who doesn't want this, we want to get it cooking with any top teams in our league or theirs, doesn't matter we are gonna just ball hard against who ever.Aren'tthe votes based on waterbury teams cause from what I read there were supposedly a few teams in the waterbury league that didn't want to merge, I doubt theres a team in the Hartford league scared of the merge
|
|
| Assassin's
March 23, 2011
8:11:22 PM
Entry #: 3683688
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
8:12:30 PM
Entry #: 3683690
| 10 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Still 20 teams who have not voiced their opinion. Please speak up... Thank you
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
8:15:33 PM
Entry #: 3683694
| lol... i have my crew behind me arbitration... i can gurantee you 16 teams that are for it lol... so you just need to tal to your teams and commisioner... My teams ride with me lmao .. i trained em to be killerz... The wolverines asked me for the toughest possible schedule last night... We are animals opver here... talk to your side we are good.. the team with the worst record asked me for the toughest schedule... killerz i tell you
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
8:17:22 PM
Entry #: 3683695
| We are not saying anyone is afraid to play anyone else...the votes are for every team in both leagues so we can see exactly what every customer wants...we already have votes in favor of 50% of the waterbury teams...just would like input from everyone before we make the final decision on the merger and what type of merger that will take place....thank you
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
8:20:34 PM
Entry #: 3683699
| but thats my point.. your league was willing to let new england connection, gladiators, etc etc come into your league.... now that its hartford theres hesitation... sometimes you have to read between the lines
merge with new york , rhode island but not harttford..come on mannn lol...like i said we cant make you lol
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
8:21:44 PM
Entry #: 3683700
| I understand Cash.... I like that you have everyone on board, just was trying to get confirmation from everyone on the board that way when the final decision is made no one can come back to you or Chris complaining about it...just trying to make it easier on you guys...but since hartford is 100% in favor and we already have confirmation of 50% of waterbury it just comes down to the type of merger which will be decided Friday night in the meeting.... Can't wait to get this done and get some football started.
|
|
| CASH
March 23, 2011
8:23:44 PM
Entry #: 3683701
| no problem
|
|
| Ace of Fadez
March 23, 2011
8:39:29 PM
Entry #: 3683716
| Yo arbitrator we are voting for the merger above. isn't thatwhat this was? Vote for the plan above or vote for cash's. We vote for chris proposal at the top
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
8:44:51 PM
Entry #: 3683723
| Yes the votes were for teams in favor of the proposal at the top of this posting but we have decided to hold an captains meeting Friday night in which we will discuss the two options..and make the final decision based on what the majority of the captains, Chris, and Antwon all want.
|
|
| Antwon Blunt- CFFL
March 23, 2011
8:50:37 PM
Entry #: 3683725
| i know im beatin a deadh horse but i am also in favor of everything
so if theres 100 things chris wants that he posted earlier... he can have 99 of them.. i want one... mixed playoffs... thats it.. nothing else... i want one percent of all the requests...
so chris proposal is my proposal.. except there is one playoffs instead of 2... there are no other differences.
again i emphasize if my teams register with chris this isnt even an issue... hed have to put all teams in one playoff
why cant that be done now? seriously? lol
|
|
| Sharks
March 23, 2011
9:15:56 PM
Entry #: 3683749
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 23, 2011
9:17:10 PM
Entry #: 3683750
| 11 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Still 19 teams who have not voiced their opinion. Please speak up... Thank you
|
|
| Wolverines
March 24, 2011
12:16:32 AM
Entry #: 3683890
| For it
|
|
| Arbitration
March 24, 2011
12:18:09 AM
Entry #: 3683891
| 12 teams - For it
0 teams - Against it
Still 18 teams who have not voiced their opinion. Please speak up... Thank you
|
