 |
Author |
TOPIC: Connecticut Cup Series (CCS) Rankings 4/10/11 |
|
| CFFL
April 19, 2011
10:05:43 AM
Entry #: 3705518
| Connecticut Cup State Rankings
#1 New Britain Young Gunz (18-2) 961.94 pts
#2 Willimantic Bulldogs (14-1) 676.66 pts
#3 Hartford Franchise (14-4) 617.40 pts
#4 Southington Knights (11-1) 564.60 pts
#5 West Hartford Vikings (11-8) 550pts
#6 Ansonia Gatorz (10-2) 484.53 pts
#7 Hartford Steelers (9-8) 423.52 pts
#8 Wtby. Southside Raiders (9-4) 375.49 pts
#9 Waterbury Saints (7-3) 266.19pts
#10 Hartford Oilers (7-9) 218.75pts
#11 CT Trojans (4-3) 183 pts
#12 Hartford Eagles (6-6) 174.68 pts
#13 Southington Warriors (7-8) 152.11pts
#14 New Britain Assassins (5-11) 130.45 pts
#15 Hartford Gatorz (5-6) 114.03 pts
#16 New Haven Chargers (2-1) 100pts
#17 Harford Red Devils (4-8) 90.9 pts
#18Mass. Papercity Havoc (2-0) 88.8 pts
#19 Waterbury Stunnaz (4-5) 86.4 pts
#20 Enfield Bearcats (2-0) 77.7pts
#21 Waterbury Old Skool (4-9) 61.5 pts
#22 Ctflagnow.com Gamblers (2-3) 55.5pts
#23 Springfield Lions Den (1-1) 50pts
#24 Hartford Outlawz (2-9) 27.27pts
#25 Harford wolverines (3-9)21.4 pts
#26 Waterbury 937 boys (3-9) 12.5 pts
Unranked (0 points)
Bristol Bellcity
Danbury Tig ol bitties
Hartford Hit Squad
Waterbury Titans
Hartford Cowboys
CT Elite
Hartford Beach Raiders
Waterbury Pookies
CT Canes
Waterbury Irish
Hartford Northend Ravens
Harford Rams
Bristol Sharks
THESE RANKINGS AND POINT SYTEM TAKES A LONG TIME TO COMPLIL
NEXT RANKINGS WILL BE RELEASED AFTER WEEK 6, FOLLOWED BY WEEK 10 AND THEN FOLLOWED BY LEAGUE CHIPS
ONLY THE TOP 16 WILL QUALIFY TO MAKE THE PRO DIVISION IN THE TOURNAMENT
**THESE RANKING DO NOT INCLUDE GAMES AFTER APRIL 1OTH**
FEEL FREE TO ASK QUSTIONS OR SUGGETIONS
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
11:20:16 AM
Entry #: 3705606
| So a team that is 12-20 will receive more credit (depending on calibur of wins) than a team that is 10-0?
That doesn't really make much sense...
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
11:46:05 AM
Entry #: 3705636
| How far back is this dated?
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
11:47:01 AM
Entry #: 3705639
| IF TEAM A IS 12-20.... AND YOUR 12 WINS ARE AGAINST ALL THE "TOP TEAMS"...TEAM B IS 10-0 AGAINST ALL THE SCRUBS IN THE LEAGUE...
I THINK IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE TO GIVE THE 12-20 TEAM MORE CREDIT...JUST LIKE THE NCAA...WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
BIG TIME CONFERENCES GET MORE CREDIT THAN SMALL TIME CONFERENCES...IN ANY SPORT
ALAH BOISE STATE, U7CONN, VIRGINIA COMMON WEATLH.... WHAT SPORTS DYOU WATCH...TABLE TENNIS?
PLS TEAM A ALSO PUT THEMSELVES ON THE LINE WAY MORE TIMES...
YOUR THEORY IS AN EXAGERATED ONE... AND MOST LIKELY NOT POSSIBLE DUE TO THE FACT WHEN ONE TEAM WINS ANOTHE TEAM LOSES.. IN MY FORMUAL THE RANKINGS EVOLVE. AS TEAMS FADE YOUR POINTS BECOME LOWER, AS TEAMS RISE PONTS BECOME HIGHER
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
11:47:53 AM
Entry #: 3705641
| GOES BACK TO FALL 2010.. WE WILL START THE SERIES EVERY FALL AND FINIH IN THE SUMMER WITH THE TOURNAMENT
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
11:52:26 AM
Entry #: 3705645
| y do u talk so much shit cash when simple questions are asked. in no way did they talk about you. you come off real sensitive cash.someone ask a question you get baby estrogen cash. Lol
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
11:53:43 AM
Entry #: 3705647
| Bearcats, Gamblers, Lions Den and Havoc wasn't in neither league Fall 2010 how did they make it? This is not a complaint its trying to understand how the system works
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
11:56:48 AM
Entry #: 3705649
| GAMES ARE FROM FALL 2010 UNTIL WEEK 2 OF THIS SEASON... YOU CAN CHECK TEAMS STANDINGS IN THE 2010-2011 CR CUP SERIES DIVISON AND SEE WHERE THE WINS AND LOSSES CAME FROM.
@ THE NO NAME... IF I WERE A CRYBABY ID BE MORE LIKE YOU...ID SAY... THIS MAKES NO SENSE! AND THEN ID CRY WHEN IT GETS EXPLAINED TO ME HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. CAN YOU SAY A-D-D ? HAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
11:58:19 AM
Entry #: 3705650
| I never said the 12-20 teams beat all the top teams...if a team is 12-20 obviously they didn't beat all the top teams....
You don't see teams like BYU going 12-0 against Uconn/UNC/ DUKE/ Ohio State etc....and then losing 20 games to teams like New Mexico, Depaul, Yale etc...
If you are 12-20 its because you can't beat the good teams..if you are 10-0 you beat everyone who you played...so although 10-0 compared to 12-20 might not be a huge difference in ranking points its a huge difference in overall ability and record.
For example...the combined winning percentage of the 12 teams that team A beat are .400 (for example) in your math system, they would have 480 points right???
The 10-0 team beat teams that are a combined .425 (had a much better record obviously and beat better teams)...in your dumb ass system, they have 425 points...
|
|
| Fan of the game
April 19, 2011
11:59:35 AM
Entry #: 3705653
| LOL cash your to much
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
12:05:32 PM
Entry #: 3705661
| OK YOUR NOT A SPORTS FAN AS YOU JUST TOLD ME A WINNING PERCENTAGE OF .425... IS A WAY BETTER PERCENTAGE THAN .400... IM ALL SET HERE..HAHAHAHAHHAA
WITH THIS "DUMB SYSTEM" ITS BASED ON .425 AND .400 BEING CLOSE NUMBERS..HAHAHAHAHAHA
WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TOO?..A 2.5% DIFERENCE IN STRENGHTH OF VICTORY HAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHA
SO I GUESS THE 10-0 TEAM PLAYED WAYYYYYYY WAYYYYY WAYYYYY HARDER TEAMS LMAO
IM GOING TO CREATE A SPORTS UNIVERSITY
|
|
April 19, 2011
12:07:44 PM
Entry #: 3705663
| ok that make sense that's cool
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
12:10:30 PM
Entry #: 3705667
| I didn't say .425 (which is stregth of schedule) was way better than .400...
I said the Winning Percentage....1.000 compared to .375 was a huge difference...
Dumbass
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
12:13:00 PM
Entry #: 3705669
| no one would show up to your university lol. who wants a sensitive bum as a teacher FACTS!! hahahahahahaha
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
12:18:15 PM
Entry #: 3705672
| WELL ITS NOT "STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE" ITS "STRENGTH OF VICTORY"... TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS....
STRENGTH OF VICTORY= WINNING PERCENTAGE OF THE TEAMS YOU BEAT (NOT THE TEAMS YOU PLAYED)
SO A-D-D BOY HERES AN EXAMPLE
...BOISE STATE 10-0
SOV= .100
BOISE STATE GETS 10 POINTS
...ALABAMA 8-2
SOV= .800
ALABAMA GETS 64 POINTS
ITS BASED ON THE TEAM YOU BEAT NOT THE TEAMS YOU PLAYED A-D-D BOY HAHAHAHAHAAAA
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
12:28:23 PM
Entry #: 3705687
| I completely understand the Boise State/ Alabama reference....however that is not what i'm talking about...that does not apply to your league, as the SOV possibilities are pretty consistent across the board, because the majority of teams play the exact same teams....
So for example..The Mass Havoc are 3-0, lets assume they go 10-0, which means they would have beaten pretty much every good team in the league, which would give them a SOV of about .540??
They would get 540 points right??
The Gamblers go 8-2, and beat the middle of the pack teams and the crappy teams and a couple good teams, so end up with a SOV of .490...
They would be at 392 after the spring..
The Havoc play in Springfield in the fall, so they don't come back to your league for the fall, the gamblers next season go 5-5, only beat crap teams, the combined SOV for them in the Fall is .300 (which is horrrrrrrible).
They will gain 150 points for the fall
Fall and Spring Stats combined rankings
Gamblers 13-7 542 points
Havoc 10-0 540 points
This system is just nuts....the Havoc beat every good team they ever played...beat every team they played...the Gamblers beat 1 or 2 good teams and a bunch of bummy teams...but are ranked higher
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
12:43:17 PM
Entry #: 3705713
| IM JUST GOING TO SAY YOUR RIGHT BECAUSE YOU MISSING WHOLE ENTIRE CONCEPTS...
AN ANALOGY I USED BEFORE... MY SMALL COUSIN CAN BEAT ME IN A GAME TO 2... BUT IN A GAME TO 15 HE HAS NO SHOT
YOU MISSING THE ENTIRE CONCEPT THAT THE HAVOC IN YOUR EXAMPLE HAVE PLAYED IN 10 LESS GAMES
YOUR MISSING THE ENTIRE CONCEPT THAT THE TEAMS EVOLVE AND CHANGE AND WHAT MAY HAVE BEEN A GOOD RECORD A PRIOR SEASON, MAY NOT BE A GOOD RECORD THE NEXT SEASON
BUT I GUESS WE SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY GIVE TEAMS POINTS WHO DONT PUT THEMSELVES ON THE LINE AS MUCH AS OTHER TEAMS
JUST FOR GIGGLES HAVOC COULD BE GOOD FOR SPRING SEASON A YEAR, VIKINGS MAY BE GOOD IN TOURNEYS, GUNZ MAYBE GOOD IN FALL...
YOU CANT PENALIZE TEAMS FOR PUTTING THEIR RECORDS ON THE LINE MORE THAN OTHER TEAMS...DO YOU GET IT NOW?
IF YOU PLAYED IN HALF AS MANY GAMES WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU SHOULD BE REANKED HIGHER.
YOUVE PLAYED IN HALF AS MANY GAMES! AND IN MY SYSTEM YOUR STILL RANKED WHERE YOU SHOULD BE... IT JUST TOOK YOU LESS TIME, THAN LETS SAY THE GAMBLERS IN YOUR EXAMPLE
HAVOC DID IN 1 SEASON WHAT THE GAMBLERS DID IN 2 IN YOUR EXAMPLE... IT DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS SYSTEM..LOL
|
|
| CASH
April 19, 2011
12:46:47 PM
Entry #: 3705721
| IT TOOK 20 GAMES FOR GAMBLERS TO ATTAIN 540 POINTS
IT TOOK HAVOC 10 GAMES TO OBTAIN 540 POINTS
BOTH TEAMS HAVE BEEN AWARDED FOR WHAT THEY ACCOMPLISHED HANDSOMELY LOL..
ITS JUST LIKE NASCARS SPRINT SERIES, OR THE PGA TOUR, JUST TOOK THAT IDEA AND TRANSFERRED IT TO THE LEAGUE THATS ALL!
iF THEY CAN DO IT AND ITS OK, WHY CANT I DO IT AND ITS DUMB? LOL
I GUESS THE PGA TOUR AND THE SPRINT SERIES ARE ALSO RUNNING DUMB IDEAS... IF YOU DONT SHOW UP TO AN EVENT.... GUESS WHAT YOU GET NO POINTS!
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
1:01:08 PM
Entry #: 3705747
| what u dont get cash is any given sunday. anyone can beat anyone
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
1:07:50 PM
Entry #: 3705753
| seem like gamblers is in every ranking when they shouldn't be wonder why that is
|
|
| 7 Knights
April 19, 2011
1:44:32 PM
Entry #: 3705804
| Cash if this started in fall 2010 we only have 1 loss to the (real) gators.. We went 9-1 in fall (champs) and we are 2-0 this spring. Either way rankings seem off. Exmaple: We have never lost to the vikings and they have 8 losses total. We beat the gators in chip and played all the same teams as they did.. Just saying!
|
|
| cash
April 19, 2011
1:58:24 PM
Entry #: 3705828
| sean im sure some waterbury standings maybe off, but the website says you lost to the saints on october 5th heres the link
http://wfflcentral.bravehost.com/ScheduleResults08.html
also the ranking system gives less value to wins that come against teams with terrible records, and more value to tins against teams with good records
Not to bash your league in waterbury, but it hurt the points as most of those teams yuu beat up on had very very bad records.
but again i only used what the website told me. Should i change the score of that game?
also you can check all your wins and losses in both leagues right here on this site including the scores
|
|
| cash
April 19, 2011
2:01:10 PM
Entry #: 3705829
| also sean im open to the idea to awarding bonus points for winning a league or tournament.
|
|
| 7
April 19, 2011
2:03:35 PM
Entry #: 3705833
| We never lost to the saints. Not knocking this idea at all. Its a start!
|
|
| cash
April 19, 2011
2:05:29 PM
Entry #: 3705837
| ok ill change that game and im sure the points will put you over the gatorz give me a few to calculate..
again you can check for yourself the website said you lost, sorry about that
|
| 111 c6
April 19, 2011
2:11:46 PM
Entry #: 3705846
| SORRY 7, I KNOW YOU WILL EAT MY UN BORN CHILDREN...
^^^^Cash's scared voice in his head
|
|
| 7
April 19, 2011
2:15:53 PM
Entry #: 3705851
| Cash that website has to be old! We havnt lost to the saints since 07 maybe 08. Last yr we were 8-1 before chip vs gators and they were 9-0.
|
|
| cash
April 19, 2011
2:19:08 PM
Entry #: 3705857
| well I hope not or i did a lot of work for no reason lol but if it is right you are correct and you would now be ranked ahead of gatorz and ahead ov vikings
knights now have 564.60 points
corrected list below and on above post
**if this list is old... we will just have to start saeries with spring records**
Connecticut Cup State Rankings
#1 New Britain Young Gunz (18-2) 961.94 pts
#2 Willimantic Bulldogs (14-1) 676.66 pts
#3 Hartford Franchise (14-4) 617.40 pts
#4 Southington Knights (11-1) 564.60 pts
#5 West Hartford Vikings (11-8) 550pts
#6 Ansonia Gatorz (10-2) 484.53 pts
#7 Hartford Steelers (9-8) 423.52 pts
#8 Wtby. Southside Raiders (9-4) 375.49 pts
#9 Waterbury Saints (7-3) 266.19pts
#10 Hartford Oilers (7-9) 218.75pts
#11 CT Trojans (4-3) 183 pts
#12 Hartford Eagles (6-6) 174.68 pts
#13 Southington Warriors (7-8) 152.11pts
#14 New Britain Assassins (5-11) 130.45 pts
#15 Hartford Gatorz (5-6) 114.03 pts
#16 New Haven Chargers (2-1) 100pts
#17 Harford Red Devils (4-8) 90.9 pts
#18Mass. Papercity Havoc (2-0) 88.8 pts
#19 Waterbury Stunnaz (4-5) 86.4 pts
#20 Enfield Bearcats (2-0) 77.7pts
#21 Waterbury Old Skool (4-9) 61.5 pts
#22 Ctflagnow.com Gamblers (2-3) 55.5pts
#23 Springfield Lions Den (1-1) 50pts
#24 Hartford Outlawz (2-9) 27.27pts
#25 Harford wolverines (3-9)21.4 pts
#26 Waterbury 937 boys (3-9) 12.5 pts
Unranked (0 points)
Bristol Bellcity
Danbury Tig ol bitties
Hartford Hit Squad
Waterbury Titans
Hartford Cowboys
CT Elite
Hartford Beach Raiders
Waterbury Pookies
CT Canes
Waterbury Irish
Hartford Northend Ravens
Harford Rams
Bristol Sharks
|
|
| cash
April 19, 2011
2:24:37 PM
Entry #: 3705867
| just confirmed that that list is old... cake is being removed from my face!
Ill be making a new rankintgs with just the spring recosrs asap!....hahahahahahhahah
Cash=Loser!
|
|
| 7
April 19, 2011
2:26:07 PM
Entry #: 3705870
| Maybe you run the records of 2010 fall and spring just to see how it works. Then start fresh this year so there is no arguments.
|
|
| caqsh
April 19, 2011
2:28:12 PM
Entry #: 3705874
| definitly 7 lol
|
|
|
April 19, 2011
2:37:53 PM
Entry #: 3705882
| @ the guys who said its unfair to the havoc cuz they dnt play in the cffl in the fall. Who problem is that. Why should any team suffer cuz the havoc decided not to play here. That part of playing is this league is you get rewarded.
|
|
| yup
April 19, 2011
3:54:06 PM
Entry #: 3705957
| If your gonna stick to this cash I think it should be a fresh start
|
