 |
Author |
TOPIC: OWNER MEETINGS PRE SEASON |
|
| ANTWON BLUNT
June 3, 2010
2:31:31 PM
Entry #: 3493381
| I THOUGHT I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THAT ALL THESE TOPICS HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED IN PRE- SEASON OWNER MEETINGS... AT ARCH STREET... AND ONLINE MEETINGS FOR THOSE WHO COULDNT ATTEND...I WANT TO LISTEN TO ALL SUGGESTIONS... AS I SEE MOST OWNERS DID NOT COMMUNICATE WITH PLAYERS WITH HOW THE LEAGUE WAS RUN... SOME PLAYERS DID NOT EVEN KNOW WE TOOK STATS IN THE LEAGUE
IM NOT MAD THAT THE PLAYOFF FORMAT, PLAYOFFS, AND EVERY OTHER ISSUE WAS DISCUSSED BEFORE THE SEASON...BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT NOW THAT ITS CRUNCH TIME... I FEEL LIKE ITS A COP OUT FOR SOME OF THE SUGGESTIONS
PLAYOFF FORMAT... MY PROBLEM IS NO ONE SAYS THAT THE ACC IS STRONGER OR EVEN CLOSE... I THINK IT IS A WEAKER CONFERENCE. BUT WHY WOULD THAT MATTER ABOUT YOUR OWN SCHEDULES. BY TRYING TO "EVEN" OUT THE LEAGUE.... THAT WOULD BE PUTTING THE TOP TEAMS DUCKS IN A ROW. WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT THAT. PLEASE THE ARGUMENTS THAT THE ACC IS WEAKER...YOUR MOST LIKELY RIGHT... BUT IT DOESNT CHANGE THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE TO WIN ON YOUR OWN
PLAYOFFS IN ONE DAY... I CAN DEFINITLY WORK ON THIS... BUT THE TIME CONSTRAINTS HAS THE VIRGINIA TOURNAMENT THE WEEK AFTER.. WHICH CAUSES 2 WEEKS IN BETWEEN 2 GAMES... ILL BE POSTING AN ALTERNATIVE SHORTLY TO ALL THE PLAYOFFS BEING IN ONE DAY
NEXT YEAR MAYBE PLAYERS SHOULD ALSO JOIN THE MEETINGS AS THESE ISSUES WERE ALREADY DISCUSSED
|
|
| the voice........
June 3, 2010
3:01:05 PM
Entry #: 3493419
| Antwon- at this piont everything should be left the way it is or you'll have to change everything that everyone is complaining about. you made a great point when you said "they should have said something in the pre-season meeting."
im pretty sure there is something that each team would like to change- but to go back and try to change things to please people now is foolish. "THE HEY IS IN THE BARN"
you can go 1 1/2 weeks before the big dance and change anything now.
even if you have 100 people that have a problem with the way it is, think about the 300 others that are in compliance and already planned ahead for this months ago that have other things to do on the off dates that werent booked, or vacations with thier families.
YOU'LL PROBABLY CREATE MORE PROBLEMS CHANGING IT
half these people complaining will lose and be 1 and done anyway, every team wont be playing 3 in one day anyway, only two teams will, and lets face it- if you're not the knights or the young gunz you shouldnt be worrying about this anyway- you should be worrying about winning your remaining games.
Antwon- if you change this now, what would that say about your league, people will never take it serious- do i think there should be changes, of course- we all do, but is now the best time to implement them you have to wait until next season for change. NAME ME ANY SPORT ON ANY LEVEL, THAT WILL CHANGE ITS FORMAT WITH 1 1/2 WEEKS LEFT IN THE SEASON.
|
|
| ANTWON BLUNT
June 3, 2010
3:10:21 PM
Entry #: 3493430
| I SAID A LONG TIME AGO... THAT MOST TEAMS WILL B PLAYING 1 GAME OR MAXIMUM 2 ANYWAYS... ONLY THE CHAMPS WILL HAVE ALL THE GAMES... YOUR BACK ON POINT VOICE LOL.... BY THE WAY THERE WAS NO CHANCE OF SPREADING ALL THE GAMES OUT... ONLY ADDING 1 ROUND ON SUNDAY TO SATURDAY
|
|
| Sportscenter
June 3, 2010
3:13:47 PM
Entry #: 3493432
| Voice you tell me how many sports starting they first year this year? Change is good cash if you change people wouldn't look at you different they would see a buisness man that responds and respects what the customer is asking for which makes for good buisness so far every team seems to be on the same page about this so why not take it into thought?
|
|
| the voice........
June 3, 2010
3:24:35 PM
Entry #: 3493443
| ....agreed 100%, change is good- but for next season- in business, timing is everything and right now whether you want to believe so or not is not the best time to change something like that. people will respect change from one season to the next, people will see push over changing everything thats requested. he's already took it into consideration and said in the above post that it couldnt be done, other than adding a round to sat- and what sense does that make.
|
