SITE REMOVAL NOTIFICATION!

This site has not been updated and will be removed from the LeagueLineup network shortly. If you'd like to keep the site active please log in to the administration section.

!MESSAGE BOARD!

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Back to Message Board List   |  Go to Last Entry on Page Add New Topic  |  Reply
Author TOPIC: "KING of CT" SEEDINGS
GCFFA

July 20, 2011
3:22:28 PM

Entry #: 3766653
The "KING of CONNECTICUT" State Championship Tournament will again seed teams based on their performance in the 2011 Spring Leagues (Waterbury and Hartford). Playoff games were added to the records for each team.


The pools for Saturdays pool play will be determined as follows.

1. The Spring league champions from both the Waterbury and Hartford league will be seeded #1 and #2 with the #1 seed going to the team with the better overall record.

2. The runners-up from each league will then be seeded #3 and #4, again with the #3 seed going to the team with better overall record. In this instance where the KNIGHTS particpated an both playoffs and made both Championship games, the Hartford Runner-up will be awarded to the Hartford league team with the best overall record.

3. The remaining teams are seeded based on their record with tie breakers as follows

** Head to Head (if applicable)
** Point Differential
** Points Allowed
** Coin Toss

1. KNIGHTS (15-2)** GCFFA CHAMPION, CFFL RUNNER-UP
2. STEELERS (11-3)** CFFL CHAMPION
3. CHARGERS (7-6)** GCFFA RUNNER-UP
4. HAVOC (10-2)** CFFL BEST RECORD
5. YOUNG GUNZ (9-3)
6. WARRIORS (8-3)** DIFFERENTIAL +80
7. BULLDOGS (8-3)** DIFFERENTIAL +27
8. TROJANS (8-4)** DIFFERENTIAL +113
9. FRANCHISE (8-4)** DIFFERENTIAL -9
10. TIG OLE BITTIES (7-4)** DIFFERENTIAL +71
11. BEARCATS (7-4)** DIFFERENTIAL +47
12. HIGH ROLLERS (7-4)** DIFFERNTIAL +38
13. GATORS (7-5)
14. VIKINGS (6-5)** DIFFERENTIAL +63
15. OILERS (6-5)** DIFFERENTIAL +23
16. BEACH RAIDERS (6-5)** DIFFERENTIAL -3
17. HIT SQUAD (5-6)** DIFFERNTIAL +9
18. POOKIES (5-6)** DIFFERENTIAL -16
19. WOLVERINES (5-6)** DIFFERNTIAL -48
20. CANES (5-7)


JG

July 20, 2011
4:10:54 PM

Entry #: 3766695
Its unlikely but if those 14 show, plus the Canes move up cause of not enough Open teams it could look like this

1. Knights
10. Bearcats
15. Canes

2. Steelers
9. Franchise
14. Pookies

3. Chargers
8. Trojans
13. B. Raiders

4. Havoc
7. Bulldogs
12. Oilers

5. Gunz
6. Warriors
11. Gators




July 21, 2011
7:54:15 AM

Entry #: 3767055
Why are the Chargers ranked higher than the Havoc? Smh here we go again



July 21, 2011
11:43:29 AM

Entry #: 3767245
cuz they were the runner up in the league championship game smart guy..........smh



July 22, 2011
6:08:51 PM

Entry #: 3768282
just because they went to the semi's doesnt make them a better team. The Chargers would not make it to the semis in Hartford. I mean come on your third best team just won the.open bracket. Case closed stop being stupid with these seedings.



July 22, 2011
6:34:40 PM

Entry #: 3768298
They went to the chip not the semis and from Hartford only thegunz and Steelers are better then the chargers and those would be great games as they always are

CT Fan

July 23, 2011
9:22:33 AM

Entry #: 3768492
Thats real Talk too. Has nothing to do with what league. Its simple u put all these teams in one league & the only team from Hartford that would beat the Chargers is the Steelers & YGz. Which will be really good games. Those 2 teams DOMINATE over there. Everyone else is playing for 3rd place on down !

Steeler Camp

July 27, 2011
10:45:40 AM

Entry #: 3770902
Chris any info on this weeks Kings Of Ct? We have alot of heads on are team that play with CTP. Jus wanted to know if any of the game times would be posted.



July 27, 2011
1:24:32 PM

Entry #: 3771023
thats why this tournament is held to stop this stupid discussion of whos better waterbury v hartford

Steelers Camp

July 27, 2011
2:28:18 PM

Entry #: 3771091
We was jus asking a time, we can careless about that. If we got enough to start the game, so be it. Your not going to hear anything from are camp, if we had this person we could've should've would've. No need to come this way wit that.

Back to Top