 |
Author |
TOPIC: Tournament Suggestions |
|
| Cyclone16
August 23, 2011
1:51:49 PM
Entry #: 3787029
| Please provide feedback on what you thought went well and what you thought could use some improvement. There is no guarantee anything will be changed, but it would be nice to know what you all thought.
|
|
| Cap8
August 25, 2011
8:13:33 AM
Entry #: 3788271
| It is perfect just cross bracket the losers so Stockmen don't play Pub twice, they would play Tonka at that part of the tourney.
|
|
| files
August 25, 2011
8:16:54 AM
Entry #: 3788272
| they didn't play Pub twice...
|
|
| tall & lanky
August 25, 2011
8:26:23 AM
Entry #: 3788278
| we were slated to play twice - if we played better at the 1pm game...
I have no issues with the tournament, it was a blast.
I will see the league reps at the State Tourney meeting in the next month or so - please bring discussion points or concerns there as well..
|
|
| Poose Pow
August 25, 2011
9:22:12 AM
Entry #: 3788313
| I think he meant Shamrocks instead of Stockmens...it was weird that there wasn't cross bracketing in the losers bracket.
However...to win the title you have to beat everyone so in the long run it doesn't really matter.
|
|
| MNBBALL
August 26, 2011
7:28:53 PM
Entry #: 3789277
| Lets maybe try pool to change things up next year. For example:
Bracket 1.
#1 Riverview
#2 Skyline
#3 St. Paul
Bracket 2.
#1 St. Paul
#2 Park National
#3 Riverview
Bracket 3.
#1 Park National
#2 Riverview
#3 Skyline
Bracket 4.
#1 Skyline
#2 St. Paul
#3 Riverview
Each team plays each other and the winners from each brackets goes on to the next round with tie breaker for run differential.
Then its bracket 1 vs 2 winners and bracket 2 vs 3 winners. Winners advance for a 2 out of 3 in the state title
Thoughts?
|
|
| MNBBALL
August 26, 2011
7:33:30 PM
Entry #: 3789280
| Correction:
Bracket 4.
#1 Skyline
#2 St. Paul
#3 Park National
Then its bracket 1 vs 2 winners and bracket 3 vs 4 winners. Winners go on to a 2 out 3 title
|
|
| MNBBALL
August 26, 2011
7:36:45 PM
Entry #: 3789285
| Brackets 1 and 2 at one location and brackets 3 and 4 at another in pool play. Final four played at main location
|
|
| Cyclone16
August 28, 2011
11:09:29 AM
Entry #: 3789765
| Good suggestion we'll need to look at the total number of games played and see how it all stacks up plus when teams play so teams aren't idle too long or not long enough.
Regarding Loser's bracket crossover, I agree in part because there is a lot of interleague play but it helps create a final weekend were all leagues are represented and that has been happening fairly consistently the last several years.
|
