 |
Author |
TOPIC: Chris Zeer is getting smoked in the poll |
|
| Anthony Toma
August 24, 2009
2:43:17 PM
Entry #: 3254785
| Question: Who has more friends?
Response Pct Votes
Chris Zeer 15.8% 3
Anthony Acho 84.2% 16
|
|
| Anthony Toma
August 24, 2009
2:43:51 PM
Entry #: 3254786
| It should be 2 to 17. I voted for Chris on accident.
|
|
| eno keno
August 24, 2009
3:03:16 PM
Entry #: 3254810
| awwwwwwwwww its ok chris even though your whole team hates you, ill be your friend
|
|
| Nate Dogg
August 24, 2009
3:05:43 PM
Entry #: 3254812
| Nolan the only friends you have are the ones you get at 2am on saturday night, and those only last until Bob calls you for your gamee times Sunday morning.
And stop cheap shotting my brother-in-law you B@#$%
|
|
| eno keno
August 24, 2009
3:12:02 PM
Entry #: 3254825
| hey i made it to the game and we won. all i needed was a pair of shorts, and it was nice of you to give me yours but i think you're mad i streached out the croch on them and now you cant fit into it
|
|
| Nate Dogg
August 24, 2009
3:20:52 PM
Entry #: 3254844
| I dunno about stretching out the croch but you sure did leave some streaks you dirty sanchez. Who you think you are sitting in my office seat. Get out of my office and go back to hanging out with bob.
Green Machine is gonna need a tune up if you want to beat yellow sonny boy!
|
|
| eno keno
August 24, 2009
3:38:13 PM
Entry #: 3254878
| you're rite those streaks are nasty, but they're not from me. it happened when i crushed chris sesi, he all the sudden lost control of his bodily fluids and shit all over the place. and the only reason im here is to try to chakee your secretary.
and for the record i would rather be hanging with bob
|
|
| Anthony Toma
August 24, 2009
3:42:56 PM
Entry #: 3254886
| Nolan
Last time I checked she was wearing a ring.
|
| eno keno
August 24, 2009
3:47:43 PM
Entry #: 3254899
| and thats the beauty of it..... no one will ever know!!!!!!!!!!
|
| eno keno
August 24, 2009
3:49:47 PM
Entry #: 3254905
| maybe i should not have made that last statement public. it'l be our little secret shhhhhhhhhhhh
|
|
| Nate Dogg
August 24, 2009
3:56:11 PM
Entry #: 3254916
| So back to football...
AT I think we are going to have to start losing now so we dont have to play you in the playoffs.
Naw we'll just have to beat you guys then instead of in the Champ game.
Green blows. Russ is a much better white guy then the new one we have.
Cris I want my pancakes!!! Dylan for Nick Ammori, they probably weigh the same so pound for pound youre not losing anything.
|
|
| eno keno
August 24, 2009
3:57:56 PM
Entry #: 3254919
| nice right hook Ant, my jaw is still sore
|
|
| Chris Sesi
August 24, 2009
7:31:02 PM
Entry #: 3255152
| A Wise man on Green alasas (Nolan) asked me what happens when an unstoppable force (Yellow) meets an immovable object (Supposedly Green).
Awnser to Nolans question. If an unstoppable force exists (which does yellow), then an immovable object cannot exist (sorry green) because it would be able to be moved by the unstoppable force.
|
|
| Chris Sesi
August 24, 2009
7:34:15 PM
Entry #: 3255157
| Therefore according to Nolan you better get off Yellow's train tracks.
|
|
| Chris Sesi
August 24, 2009
7:36:26 PM
Entry #: 3255159
| orrr get smashed. Either way good luck to everyone
|
|
| Big Fella
August 24, 2009
7:39:49 PM
Entry #: 3255166
| Isaac Asimov answered this question rather neatly, I thought. I can't remember in which of his many books I read it (it was a long time ago), but the gist of his argument was this: A universe in which there exists such a thing as an irresistible force is, by definition, a universe which cannot also contain an immovable object. And a universe which contains an immovable object cannot, by definition, also contain an irresistible force. So the question is essentially meaningless: either the force is irresistible or the object is immovable, but not both. Jst a thought Chris
|
|
| Chris Sesi
August 24, 2009
7:42:25 PM
Entry #: 3255169
| yea but nolan said we were an unstoppable force.
|
| TAcho24
August 25, 2009
12:47:19 AM
Entry #: 3255406
| im confused. i thought this was football. not theories101
|
|
| Nate Dogg
August 25, 2009
10:55:07 AM
Entry #: 3255672
| Which came first the chicken or the egg?
|
|
| TAcho24
August 25, 2009
5:17:19 PM
Entry #: 3256144
| uuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ill take the rooster Alex
|
|
| CFL Legend
August 26, 2009
3:43:58 PM
Entry #: 3257249
| Nate really, whichever one you think came first, then it came first. Because whatever you say, goes.
|
|
| Nate Dogg
August 26, 2009
4:03:17 PM
Entry #: 3257282
| CFL Legend I dont know who you are but I like the way you talk, lol.
But no its a team game and yellow plays into whatever the defense gives us.
But I do believe the egg came first. If a chicken evolved as other creatures evolved from other creatures then it must have evolved from a similar non-chicken animal. That previous animal which was not a chicken laid an egg which was a variance of that animal, and that egg is what we now call a chicken, then the egg must have come first.
|
|
| Samona
August 26, 2009
4:48:28 PM
Entry #: 3257338
| So then what came first, the other non-chicken animal or the non-chicken animal egg?
|
|
| Big Fella
August 26, 2009
5:05:05 PM
Entry #: 3257360
| According to the Creator of chickens, and the author of the Record of their origins, chickens came first. It was on the Fifth Day of Creation Week that He created "every winged fowl after [their] kind" (Genesis 1:21) complete with the DNA to reproduce that kind. Then He "blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply" (v.22) using that DNA. For the chickens this meant lay chicken eggs. Problem solved. Nate They ask if you were doing CAL again, I said no
|
